Reconstruction of Higher Education Curriculum to Prepare the Next Generations
Abstract
Republic of Indonesia Government had issued a regulation on the national standards of higher education in 2015. UNS should immediately adjust the education process in accordance with the new regulations by reconstructing the curriculum. This study aims to analyze the reconstruction process in preparing the curriculum in UNS prepare future generations better. National standards require the higher education curriculum compiled from formulating learning outcomes to the preparation of the assessment system. This research method is a survey method. Samples are Diploma Program, Bachelor, Master Program, and Doctorate Program. Results showed that the reconstruction of the new curriculum is implemented by 45% of study program at the UNS, 60% of which is in conformity with the standards, even two courses had prepared the curriculum to standards well adapted to the AUN QA, only three study programs that have student learning outcomes have been agreed by the forum study program.
References
Anderson, L.W., dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assesing; A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of education. Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
Hayati, R. (2016). Revitalisasi Kurikulum Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Sebagai Upaya Mencetak SDM Berdaya Saing Global. Proceeding SENDI_U.
Kerja, T. (2005). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi bidang-bidang ilmu. Jakarta: Derektorat Pembinaan Akademik dan Kemahasiswaan-DIKTI-Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Indek, 8, 95.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193-212.
Mcmillin, J., & Dyball, R. (2009). Developing a whole-of-university approach to educating for sustainability linking curriculum, research and sustainable campus operations. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 55-64.
Santoro, M. D., & Betts, S. C. (2002). Making Industry—University Partnerships Work. Research-Technology Management, 45(3), 42-46.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (Chapter 7, pp. 117-141). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
